No binding position; postmillennial and amillennial views both historic
Methodist official documents do not specify a millennial position, and the tradition has historically encompassed both postmillennial and amillennial views. John Wesley himself was broadly postmillennial in his expectations — he believed the Gospel would progressively spread throughout the world and that God's kingdom would be advanced through the preaching of the Word and the transformation of society. This optimistic postmillennial vision animated much of the Methodist social reform movement (abolitionism, temperance, prison reform).
In the twentieth century, many Methodist theologians moved toward amillennial or realized eschatological positions. The United Methodist Church does not make the millennium a binding doctrinal issue. Premillennialism, particularly of the dispensationalist variety, has been much less characteristic of Methodism, though individual Methodist pastors hold various views. The focus in Methodist eschatology is on the ultimate reign of God and human participation in anticipating that reign through works of love and justice.
Key Distinctions
- Millennium view:
- amillennial — no literal future 1000-year earthly reign; the millennium is the present church age
- Rapture view:
- no separate pre-tribulation rapture; Christ's return is singular and final
- Israel role:
- the church is the new Israel; no special end-times role for national Israel
Scripture References
Sources
- United Methodist Book of Discipline, Doctrinal Standards (current edition)
- Methodist Book of Discipline