Second coming not affirmed; most UUs interpret eschatology non-literally or not at all
The UUA holds no position on the second coming of Christ, and the vast majority of UU members do not affirm a literal, personal return of Jesus Christ as a future historical event. The UUA's Unitarian heritage applied Enlightenment rationalism to biblical eschatology: apocalyptic language was interpreted as the first-century Jewish mode of expressing hope for justice, not as predictions of literal future events.
Among the minority of UU members with a broadly Christian orientation, some may hold views about a symbolic or spiritual 'return' of Christ's values and spirit in history, understood as the ongoing work of justice and love in the world. Very few contemporary UU Christians hold a literal, bodily return of Jesus as a significant theological conviction.
The UUA's orientation is toward this-worldly transformation — working to realize the 'kingdom of God' (or analogous values) in the present — rather than waiting for a supernatural intervention from outside history. Social justice activism, interfaith coalition building, and democratic participation are the UUA's eschatological practices.
Key Distinctions
- Return expectation:
- no literal second coming; progressive social transformation
- Tribulation view:
- not applicable
- Parousia nature:
- not applicable
Scripture References
Sources
- UUA heritage resources; UUA Seven Principles (no eschatological content)