Congregational with global fellowship; elder-led after 2001 reforms
In its early years under Kip McKean, the ICOC operated with a highly centralized authority structure, with McKean and the Boston Church effectively holding authority over the whole movement. This structure was extensively criticized as authoritarian, leading to a crisis in 2001–2003 in which McKean resigned and the fellowship underwent significant reform.
Post-reform ICOC governance has moved toward elder-led local churches with greater autonomy, operating within a voluntary global fellowship. Individual churches are governed by elders and deacons consistent with New Testament patterns (1 Timothy 3). The global fellowship coordinates through ICOC Leadership Council meetings and regional conferences, but without the coercive centralized authority of the early years.
Key Distinctions
- Governance model:
- hierarchical church-planting network; World Sector Leaders; discipling relationships
- Apostolic succession:
- not formally claimed; spiritual authority through discipling relationships
- Women in ministry:
- women preach and lead ministries; not elders
- Doctrinal authority:
- Scripture alone; strong emphasis on church leadership interpretation
Scripture References
Sources
- ICOC Statement of Belief
- ICOC Open Letter (2001 reform documents)